Forgot your password?
Document Actions
MBNMS Management Plan & Case Study - Fio Micheli
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Over 300 miles shoreline
5,322 sqmiles ocean, 25 miles from shore on av.
Max depth 10,633 feet
~ 3 million people living within 50 miles of shore
MBNMS management plan review
Revision of original plan, adopted with sanctuary designation in 1992
Extensive public input (20 public meetings, over 12,000 written comments, 20 SAC meetings, 68 working group meetings)
23 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management plan review
Revision of original plan, adopted with sanctuary designation in 1992
Extensive public input (20 public meetings, over 12,000 written comments, 20 SAC meetings, 68 working group meetings)
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities
Operation and Administration
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities (e.g., fishing related education and research)
Operation and Administration (e.g., Performance evaluation)
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones (e.g., community outreach, ecosystem monitoring)
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism, agriculture, commercial fisheries
Tourism: total travel-spending revenue $5.9 billions in 2003
Agriculture: valued $3.6 billions in 1999
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing inductry relatively small oprtion of overall economy. $16.6 million in 2003. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism, agriculture, commercial fisheries
Tourism: total travel-spending revenue $5.9 billions in 2003
Agriculture: valued $3.6 billions in 1999
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing industry relatively small oprtion of overall economy. $16.6 million in 2003. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
25 marine science facilities, 2,000 people, >$200 million budget
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans (means by which MBNMS identifies and organizes various management issues and tools with which to address them) guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management plan review
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities (e.g., fishing related education and research)
Operation and Administration (e.g., Performance evaluation)
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones (e.g., community outreach, ecosystem monitoring)
MBNMS
Primary objective of resource protection
EBM as a framework for addressing long-term protection of wide range of living and non-living resources
Allow multiple uses of the sanctuary that are compatible with resource protection
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS staff worked with SAC to identifypriorities, under different funding scenarios
Implementation different action plans will occur in different stages bed on urgency, expected benefits,a nd resource availability
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evauation
Interpretative facilities
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism ($5.9 billions in 2003), agriculture ($3.6 billions in 1999), commercial fisheries ($16.6 million in 2003)
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing industry relatively small portion of overall economy. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
25 marine science facilities, 2,000 people, >$200 million budget
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans (means by which MBNMS identifies and organizes various management issues, and tools with which to address them) guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS staff worked with SAC to identifypriorities, under different funding scenarios
Implementation different action plans will occur in different stages based on urgency, expected benefits, and resource availability
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Ecosystem protection
Big Sur coastal ecosystem (landslides)
Bottom trawling
Davidson Seamount
Emerging issues
Introduced species
Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring program (SIMoN)
MPAs
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Water quality
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Cruise ship discharge
Water quality protection program implementation (urban runoff, regional monitoring, marinas and boating, agriculture and rural lands)
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Wildlife disturbance
Marine mammal, seabird, and turtle disturbance
Motorized personal watercraft
Tidepool protection
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization
Application of system model and decision analysis approach to examine outcomes of different management actions from both biological and socioeconomic standpoints: case studies (small pelagics-marine mammals; diving-fishing, MPAs; beach closures; rocky shore uses and impacts)
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization (e.g., aggregate model that would help them to evaluate the relative costs and benefits of focusing on different issues or services, based on the relative uncertainty, value, potential to effect change)
Application of system model and decision analysis approach to examine outcomes of different management actions from both biological and socioeconomic standpoints: case studies (small pelagics-marine mammals; diving-fishing, MPAs; beach closures; rocky shore uses and impacts)
Needs
Identify the ecosystem components that are involved in or affected by the management issues that were identified as top priorities within the management plan (e.g., network model).
Needs
Identify the ecosystem components that are involved in or affected by the management issues that were identified as top priorities within the management plan (e.g., network model).
Performance indicators
Created with pptHtml
Over 300 miles shoreline
5,322 sqmiles ocean, 25 miles from shore on av.
Max depth 10,633 feet
~ 3 million people living within 50 miles of shore
MBNMS management plan review
Revision of original plan, adopted with sanctuary designation in 1992
Extensive public input (20 public meetings, over 12,000 written comments, 20 SAC meetings, 68 working group meetings)
23 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management plan review
Revision of original plan, adopted with sanctuary designation in 1992
Extensive public input (20 public meetings, over 12,000 written comments, 20 SAC meetings, 68 working group meetings)
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities
Operation and Administration
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities (e.g., fishing related education and research)
Operation and Administration (e.g., Performance evaluation)
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones (e.g., community outreach, ecosystem monitoring)
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism, agriculture, commercial fisheries
Tourism: total travel-spending revenue $5.9 billions in 2003
Agriculture: valued $3.6 billions in 1999
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing inductry relatively small oprtion of overall economy. $16.6 million in 2003. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism, agriculture, commercial fisheries
Tourism: total travel-spending revenue $5.9 billions in 2003
Agriculture: valued $3.6 billions in 1999
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing industry relatively small oprtion of overall economy. $16.6 million in 2003. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
25 marine science facilities, 2,000 people, >$200 million budget
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans (means by which MBNMS identifies and organizes various management issues and tools with which to address them) guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management plan review
Two additional sections addressing how sanctuary functions and operate
Partnerships and opportunities (e.g., fishing related education and research)
Operation and Administration (e.g., Performance evaluation)
Five cross-cutting plans in conjunction with Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones (e.g., community outreach, ecosystem monitoring)
MBNMS
Primary objective of resource protection
EBM as a framework for addressing long-term protection of wide range of living and non-living resources
Allow multiple uses of the sanctuary that are compatible with resource protection
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS staff worked with SAC to identifypriorities, under different funding scenarios
Implementation different action plans will occur in different stages bed on urgency, expected benefits,a nd resource availability
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evauation
Interpretative facilities
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS)
Most significant industries: tourism ($5.9 billions in 2003), agriculture ($3.6 billions in 1999), commercial fisheries ($16.6 million in 2003)
Also: aquaculture, kelp harvesting, sand mining, commercial shipping
Fishing industry relatively small portion of overall economy. >80% commercial landings: squid, rockfish, Dover sole, anchovy, mackarel, sardines, sablefish, albacore, salmon
25 marine science facilities, 2,000 people, >$200 million budget
MBNMS management plan review
25 action plans (means by which MBNMS identifies and organizes various management issues, and tools with which to address them) guiding MBNMS over the next 5 years
Most within four main themes:
Coastal development
Ecosystem protection
Water quality
Wildlife disturbance
MBNMS management action plans
Most work to be accomplished crosses many jurisdictions and exceeds resources of any one agency
MBNMS staff worked with SAC to identifypriorities, under different funding scenarios
Implementation different action plans will occur in different stages based on urgency, expected benefits, and resource availability
MBNMS management action plans
Highest priority:
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Ecosystem protection
Big Sur coastal ecosystem (landslides)
Bottom trawling
Davidson Seamount
Emerging issues
Introduced species
Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring program (SIMoN)
MPAs
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Coastal development
Coastal armoring
Desalination
Harbors and dredge disposal
Submerged cables
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Water quality
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Cruise ship discharge
Water quality protection program implementation (urban runoff, regional monitoring, marinas and boating, agriculture and rural lands)
MBNMS management plan review: action plans
Wildlife disturbance
Marine mammal, seabird, and turtle disturbance
Motorized personal watercraft
Tidepool protection
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization
Application of system model and decision analysis approach to examine outcomes of different management actions from both biological and socioeconomic standpoints: case studies (small pelagics-marine mammals; diving-fishing, MPAs; beach closures; rocky shore uses and impacts)
Beach closures and microbial contamination
Implementation of water quality protection program
Integrated monitoring network (SIMON)
MPAs
Performance evaluation
Interpretative facilities
Needs
Systematic approach to prioritization (e.g., aggregate model that would help them to evaluate the relative costs and benefits of focusing on different issues or services, based on the relative uncertainty, value, potential to effect change)
Application of system model and decision analysis approach to examine outcomes of different management actions from both biological and socioeconomic standpoints: case studies (small pelagics-marine mammals; diving-fishing, MPAs; beach closures; rocky shore uses and impacts)
Needs
Identify the ecosystem components that are involved in or affected by the management issues that were identified as top priorities within the management plan (e.g., network model).
Needs
Identify the ecosystem components that are involved in or affected by the management issues that were identified as top priorities within the management plan (e.g., network model).
Performance indicators
Created with pptHtml