Working Group Notes
31 Oct 06
Shaun
- Case studies—examples to inform how much you need to know to implement the matrix tool do this from a couple different perspectives 
- Still too complex from a user's standpoint—how to simplify this? 
- Thom—can you overlay the axes with more simplified elements??? Add to weight score the option of whether the user is interested in scoring them at that time 
- Initial building of the matrix is the biggest aspect to contend with 
- Direction of the interaction—force the user to choose, or have the option of choosing uncertainty 
- Scale 
- Scale for whole system identified by user 
- Scale for ecosystem service doesn't need to be defined because assumed its at same scale as defined ecosystem 
- Scale for impacts point source, multiple point sources, difuse 
- Documentation (text, citations): optional for all interaction cells as well as when weighting the ecosystem services and determining scale of impacts 
- Covariance interaction cells will be the same as interaction matrix, except for feedback cells which will just be 0-3 with no direction 
- Aoxia/Hypoxia listed on both axes 
- Ecosystem services/Drivers axes should be categorized in a hierarchical structure. Use MA for ecosystem services categories and prob make up categories for drivers 
- User information how to make the tool useful for both individuals and in a collaborative format 
- Could this tool be integrated into other tools that managers already use—ie population models, or scenario planning 
 Forgot your password?
           Forgot your password?
         
             
            