Fine sediment trapping in two mangrove-fringed estuaries exposed to contrasting land-use intensity, Palau, Micronesia
Wetlands Ecology and Management 12: 277–283, 2004. 277
# 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Fine sediment trapping in two mangrove-fringed estuaries exposed to
contrasting land-use intensity, Palau, Micronesia
S. Victor1,*, Y. Golbuu1, E. Wolanski2 and R.H. Richmond3
1
Palau International Coral Reef Center, P.O. Box 7086, Koror, Palau 96940, Micronesia; 2Australian
Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville MC, Qld. 4810, Australia; 3Kewalo Marine
Laboratory, University of Hawaii, 41 Ghui Street, Honolulu H1 96813, USA; *Author for
correspondence (e-mail: svictor@picrc.org)
Received 22 March 2003; accepted in revised form 15 September 2003
Key words: Land use, Mangroves, Palau, Reefs, Sediment
Abstract
A comparative study was undertaken of the fate of fine sediment in the Ngerikiil and Ngerdorch mangrove-
fringed estuaries in Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia, in 2002. The mangroves comprised 3.8% of each
catchment area, and in both systems, they trapped about 30% of the riverine sediment. Mangroves are
important buffers protecting fringing coral reefs from excessive sedimentation. The sediment yield was
significantly higher in the Ngerikiil River catchment (150 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) that has been extensively cleared
and farmed, than in Ngerdorch River catchment (1.9 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) that was still relatively pristine during
the study period.
including forest and mangrove clearing, land
Introduction
grading, road construction, farming and housing
Rates of soil erosion are rapidly increasing on development.
The Ngerdorch River drains a 39 km2 mountai-
many tropical islands as a result of land clearing
and poor land use practices. Increased erosion is nous catchment located northeast and adjacent to
threatening estuaries and coastal coral reefs the Ngerikiil River catchment (Figure 1 and
(Dubinsky and Stambler 1996; Meade 1996; Table 1). These two catchments have similar geol-
Edinger et al. 1998; Wolanski and Spagnol 2000; ogy, topography and rainfall (USDI 1997), as well
Fortes 2001; McCook et al. 2001; Wolanski et al. as an identical tidal range within their estuaries.
2003). Golbuu et al. (2003) reported that soil ero- Both rivers flow into coral-fringed lagoons through
sion is presently affecting the Ngerikiil River, its mangrove swamps, which comprises 3.8% of each
estuary and its fringing coral reefs in Airai Bay, catchment area and fringe the whole length of the
Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia (7 220 N, estuary to the tidal excursion limit.
134 340 E; Figure 1). There are no pre-development In 2000, the ‘Babeldaob Compact Road’
data on soil erosion rates in the area to help assess (a 52-mile road around Babeldaob) and the
the changes in sediment yield during the recent ‘Capital Relocation’ (a new capital building in
peak development period. However, local residents Melekeok) projects were initiated. A portion of
attribute the recent increased erosion in the catch- the Compact road runs through the Ngerdorch
ment, the reported rapid siltation of the estuary, catchment and the new Capital Building is being
and the die-off of coral reefs in Airai Bay to constructed on one hillside of the catchment.
unplanned development activities in the catchment These developments will lead to large-scale land
278
Figure 1. (a and b) Map of the Ngerdorch and Ngerikiil River catchments, Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia. (c) Ngerdorch estuary
showing the sampling sites described in the text. Abbreviations are T1, T2 . . . ¼ location of sediment traps and S0, S1. . . ¼ locations of
moored instruments.
clearing and an anticipated increase in soil farms within the catchment while the Ngerikiil
erosion in the near future. In 2002, the Ngerdorch catchment has experienced significant housing
River catchment was still relatively pristine, and farming developments during the last few
being largely forested with only three small years.
279
Table 1. Characteristics of the Ngerikiil and Ngerdorch river in-situ using water samples brought to the laboratory
catchments, Palau. and filtered on 0.45 m filters, which were dried at
60 C in a drying oven for 24 h and weighed.
Ngerikiila
Ngerdorch
At station S2, at 6 m depth, the vertical profile at
Catchment size (km2) 39 19 0.5 m intervals of horizontal currents was mea-
Mean estuarine SSC (mg lÀ1) 19 500
sured at 5 min intervals using a bottom-mounted
Peak estuarine SSC (mg lÀ1) 160 >1500
RDI Workhorse ADCP. In addition, the vertical
Mangrove area/catchment area 3.8% 3.8%
profile of salinity, temperature and SSC were mea-
Trapping in mangrove 28–44% 15–30%
Sediment yield (tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) 1.9 >150 sured at stations S0–S3 with a ship-born YSI CTD
profiler-cum nephelometer. These measurements
a
Source: Golbuu et al. (2003).
were carried out daily following a flood event in
October 2002 for one week and occasionally for the
To assess the human impact on soil erosion rates,
duration of the study. Salinity is expressed in psu,
we undertook a field study to quantify and com-
which for our study sites is practically equivalent
pare the riverine sediment load and role of man-
to ppt.
groves in determining the fate of fine sediment in
Single, bottom-mounted sediment traps, with a
the two tropical estuaries. Observations showed
diameter of 5.08 cm, were mounted at the edge of
that (1) the Ngerdorch catchment is relatively pris-
the mangroves on the river bank between stations
tine with mature vegetation, extensive ground
S0 and S3 and in the mangroves along a transect
cover and forested river banks; (2) the Ngerikiil
perpendicular to the river bank at 10, 20 and 30 m
catchment has been heavily impacted by poor
from station S1. The sediment traps were deployed
land use practices resulting in elevated rates of
on 12 October 2002 and recovered 120 days later.
soil erosion; and (3) mangroves comprises 3.8% of
The National Weather Service provided daily
each catchment area. Based on these observations,
rainfall data at Koror, located about 12 km south-
we expected the following: (1) the sediment load in
west of study sites. The rainfall data were used to
Ngerdorch River will be less than in Ngerikiil River
correlate sedimentation rate and SSC values.
and (2) the holding capacity of the mangroves will
be the same for both estuaries.
Results
Methods
Semi-diurnal, meso-tides prevailed with a pro-
Four oceanographic moorings were deployed at nounced diurnal inequality, and a strong spring–
stations S1–S3 (Figure 1) from September to neap tide cycle. The tidal range was about 2 m at
October 2003. These stations formed an along- spring tide and 1 m at neap tide. A salt wedge
channel transect. Salinity, temperature and prevailed throughout the field study (Figure 2)
suspended sediment concentration (SSC) were and the isohalines were nearly horizontal. The
measured at stations S1 (at 1 m above the bottom brackish water plume lifted off the bottom between
at 4 m depth) and S3 (at 2 m below the surface at 6 m stations S0 and S1.
depth), using self-logging Analite nephelometers, The SSC contour lines were not parallel to the
Dataflow salinometers and an YSI self-logging isohalines; instead they sloped upwards toward the
CTD-cum nephelometer. The instruments were river mouth. A turbidity maximum zone existed
attached onto 1 m long steel star pickets (rebar) near the lift-off point (Figure 2). Hence most of
driven into the substratum. The Analite nephelo- the suspended sediments fall out of suspension in
meters and YSI instrument were equipped with the estuary before the plume exits the mouth of the
wipers that cleaned the sensor every 30 and 10 min, estuary (Figure 2b). Some of that sediment may get
respectively. The instruments logged data at 10 min re-suspended during incoming tides (Figure 2c) and
intervals. The data were sampled at 0.5 s intervals may be brought back into the inner estuary and the
and averaged over 1 min for all sensors except mangroves.
the YSI, which logged data continuously without The salinity in the salt wedge at site S1 fluctuated
averaging. The nephelometers were calibrated as a result of both the tides and the rainfall (Figure 3).
280
Figure 2. A long-channel distribution of salinity (ppt) and SSC (mg LÀ1) in the Ngerdorch estuary during 17–19 October 2002. Station
locations are shown in Figure 1.
The highest values of salinity were found at high in the estuary. The salt wedge exists as a result of the
tide, and the lowest values at low tides. The SSC small tidal currents and the large depth of the estu-
values in the salt wedge at site S1 also fluctuated at ary. The riverine fine sediment did not follow the
the tidal frequency (Figure 3). They were the high- freshwater flow. Instead, the suspended sediment
est at high tide and following large rainfall events. settled out of the brackish, surface plume and was
The low-frequency currents at site S2 in the estu- re-entrained towards the head of the estuary by the
ary were predominantly landward in the salt baroclinic currents in the salt wedge. A turbidity
wedge, and seaward in the brackish water plume maximum zone prevailed near the plume lift-off
near the surface (Figure 3). The currents also varied point.
at the tidal frequency, though the tidal currents Occasional aerial observations (P. Colin, pers.
were usually smaller than the low-frequency comm.) suggest that the river plume was deflected
currents. alongshore, and this may explain why in our obser-
During the field study, neither the freshwater vations the river plume generally did not reach
plume nor the riverine fine sediments reached off- offshore waters (S3).
shore waters (S3) in quantity, except once for about It was possible to estimate the freshwater flow
20 min following a short river flood (Figure 3). The rate, Qf, from the classical two-layer estuarine
siltation rates in the mangroves were 65, 12 and equation (Pritchard and Burt 1951)
9 mg cmÀ2 dayÀ1 at 10, 20 and 30 m inside the Qf ¼ Qin
,
mangroves from the banks of the estuary. Hence
½Sout =ðSin À SoutÞ
most of the suspended sediments were deposited
within 50 m of the edge of the river, in agreement where Qf is the freshwater flow rate, Qin is the
with findings in other macro-tidal mangroves inflow rate in the salt wedge, Sin is the salinity in
(Wolanski et al. 2001). the bottom layer and Sout is the salinity in the salt
wedge. Qin was calculated as follows:
Discussion Qin ¼ uA,
The observations suggest a permanent freshwater where u was the velocity in the salt wedge as mea-
inflow that formed a permanent salt wedge circulation sured by the ADCP and A was the cross-sectional
281
Figure 3. Time-series plot of daily rainfall, salinity and SSC in the salt wedge at site S1 and near the surface at site S3, and velocity (>0 if
seaward; <0 if landward) in the brackish water plume and in the salt wedge at site 2. Station locations are shown in Figure 1.
area of the salt wedge. The brackish water outflow, the brackish water plume and the salt wedge,
Qout, was calculated as: respectively. The latter values were taken from the
daily CTD casts. The net estuarine sediment
Qout ¼ Qf þ Qin :
export, Qnet, was calculated as:
The net fine sediment fluxes in the river, in the
Qnet ¼ Qout À Qin :
brackish water plume and in the salt wedge were
then calculated as QfCf, QoutCout and QinCin, where For the period of September–October 2002, the net
Cf, Cout and Cin were the SSC values in the river, fine sediment fluxes in the river and out of the
282
estuary were 3.2 ± 1.915 and 2.3 ± 1.044 g sÀ1, watershed. The implication is that while Ngerdorch
respectively. This suggests that the mangroves watershed is still relatively pristine, coral reef con-
may trap about 0.9 g sÀ1, i.e., about 28% of the servation and management effort may not be pos-
riverine fine sediment inflow. However the possible sible without proper land management in the
error of this estimate is large. The sediment traps in surrounding catchment.
the mangroves suggest a mean settling rate of The result of this study may have broad applica-
1.4 g sÀ1, or about 44% of the riverine fine sediment tions to coastal coral reef ecosystem worldwide.
flux. Interestingly, the mangroves trap a similar Sedimentation associated with poor land manage-
fraction of the fine sediment in the Ngerikiil estu- ment has been identified as a dominant problem by
ary, although the riverine fine sediment yield in this the US Coral Reef Task Force. While physical and
estuary is 10–19 times higher (Table 1). In both the biological characteristics may vary among coral
Ngerdorch and the Ngerikiil estuaries, the man- reef sites, the outcome of poor land use will be the
groves comprise about 3.8% of the catchment. same: accumulation of sediment that will prevent
This suggests that the sediment trapping efficiency coral larval recruitment and recovery of corals
of mangroves is a function of tidal dynamics in the (Golbuu et. al. 2003).
mangrove wetlands, and not of riverine suspended
sediment concentration. Acknowledgements
The Ngerdorch estuary is still relatively pristine
compared with Ngerikiil estuary (Table 1). In the The Palau International Coral Reef Center, the
context of the whole world, the Ngerdorch estuary University of Guam, the Australian Institute of
is pristine compared with a similar sized river in Marine Science, the US-EPA STAR program
Southeast Asia and Oceania (Milliman and Meade (grant R 82-8008) and the NOAA Coastal Oceans
1983) and of a small mountainous catchment with Program (grant NA16OP2920) supported this
elevation <100 m in Oceania (Milliman and study. The authors gratefully acknowledge
Syvitski 1992). The sediment yield in the the assistance and support of Arius Merep,
Ngerdorch River (1.9 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) was slightly Masao Udui and Kenjo Yamashiro. Katharina
smaller than that (2.4 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) predicted by Fabricius, Peter Houk and Fleming U. Sengebau
Milliman and Styvitski (1992). reviewed and improved an earlier version of this
Thus, mangroves play an important role in redu- manuscript.
cing coastal erosion (Mazda et al. 2002) and pro-
tecting fringing coral reefs from sedimentation.
The Ngerdorch and Ngerikiil estuaries mangroves References
flood semi-diurnally, and they may trap up to 44%
of the riverine fine sediment. As suggested by Dubinsky Z. and Stambler N. 1996. Marine pollution and coral
Golbuu et al. (2003) for the Ngerikiil River, this reefs. Global Change Biology 2: 511–526.
Edinger E.N., Jompa J., Limmon G.V., Widjatmoko W. and
trapping efficiency, while helpful, is not sufficient
Risk M. 1998. Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in
to prevent degradation of coastal coral reefs from
Indonesia: effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing
excessive sedimentation resulting from extensive practices and changes over time. Marine Pollution Bulletin
land clearing and poor farming practices. 36(8): 617–630.
Siltation of the Ngerdorch estuary and coral reef Fortes M. 2001. The effects of siltation on tropical coastal
ecosystems. In: Wolanski E. (ed.), Oceanographic Processes
degradation in the lagoon waters is likely to occur
of Coral Reefs. Physical and Biological Links in the Great
if land clearing and poor farming practices are not
Barrier Reef, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 93–111.
regulated as they were the last few years in the Golbuu Y., Victor S., Wolanski E. and Richmond R.H. 2003.
Ngerikiil catchment. Trapping of fine sediment in enclosed bay, Palau, Micronesia.
Estuarine, Coastal and Self Science 57: 941–949.
Mazda Y., Magi M., Nanao H., Kogo M., Miyagi T.,
Kanazawa N. and Kobashi D. 2002. Coastal erosion due to
Conclusion
long term human impact on mangrove forests. Wetlands
Ecology and Management 10: 1–9.
The sediment yield in Ngerikiil watershed is 10–19 McCook L.J., Wolanski E. and Spagnol S. 2001. Modelling and
times higher than in the less developed Ngerdorch visualizing interactions between natural disturbances and
283
eutrophication as causes of coral reef degradation. In: USDI (United States Department of the Interior), 1997.
Wolanski E. (ed.), Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs. Environmental impact statement for construction of the
Physical and Biological Links in the Great Barrier Reef, CRC Palau compact road, Babeldaob Island, Republic of Palau.
Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 113–125. vol. II, Project No. 296-001, Washington D.C.
Meade R.H. 1996. River-sediment inputs to major deltas. In: Wolanski E. and Spagnol S. 2000. Environmental degradation
Milliman J.D. and Haq B.U. (eds), Sea Level Rise and by mud in tropical estuaries. Regional Environmental Change
Coastal Subsidence, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 63–85. 1(3–4): 152–162.
Milliman J.D. and Meade R.H. 1983. World-wide delivery Wolanski E., Mazda Y., Furukawa K., Ridd P., Kitheka J.,
of river sediment to the oceans. Journal of Geology 91(1): Spagnol S. and Stieglitz T. 2001. Water circulation through
1–21. mangroves and its implications for biodiversity. In: Wolanski E.
Milliman J.D. and Syvitski J.P.M. 1992. Geomorphic/tectonic (ed.), Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs: Physical and
control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance Biological Links in the Great Barrier Reef, CRC Press, Boca
of small mountainous rivers. Journal of Geology 100: Raton, FL, pp. 53–76.
525–544. Wolanski E., Richmond R.H., Davis G. and Bonito V. 2003.
Prichard D.W. and Burt W.V. 1951. An inexpensive and rapid Water and fine sediment dynamics in transient river plumes in
technique for obtaining current profiles in estuarine waters. a small, reef-fringed bay, Guam. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf
Journal of Marine Research 10: 180–189. Science 56: 1029–1040.
# 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Fine sediment trapping in two mangrove-fringed estuaries exposed to
contrasting land-use intensity, Palau, Micronesia
S. Victor1,*, Y. Golbuu1, E. Wolanski2 and R.H. Richmond3
1
Palau International Coral Reef Center, P.O. Box 7086, Koror, Palau 96940, Micronesia; 2Australian
Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville MC, Qld. 4810, Australia; 3Kewalo Marine
Laboratory, University of Hawaii, 41 Ghui Street, Honolulu H1 96813, USA; *Author for
correspondence (e-mail: svictor@picrc.org)
Received 22 March 2003; accepted in revised form 15 September 2003
Key words: Land use, Mangroves, Palau, Reefs, Sediment
Abstract
A comparative study was undertaken of the fate of fine sediment in the Ngerikiil and Ngerdorch mangrove-
fringed estuaries in Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia, in 2002. The mangroves comprised 3.8% of each
catchment area, and in both systems, they trapped about 30% of the riverine sediment. Mangroves are
important buffers protecting fringing coral reefs from excessive sedimentation. The sediment yield was
significantly higher in the Ngerikiil River catchment (150 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) that has been extensively cleared
and farmed, than in Ngerdorch River catchment (1.9 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) that was still relatively pristine during
the study period.
including forest and mangrove clearing, land
Introduction
grading, road construction, farming and housing
Rates of soil erosion are rapidly increasing on development.
The Ngerdorch River drains a 39 km2 mountai-
many tropical islands as a result of land clearing
and poor land use practices. Increased erosion is nous catchment located northeast and adjacent to
threatening estuaries and coastal coral reefs the Ngerikiil River catchment (Figure 1 and
(Dubinsky and Stambler 1996; Meade 1996; Table 1). These two catchments have similar geol-
Edinger et al. 1998; Wolanski and Spagnol 2000; ogy, topography and rainfall (USDI 1997), as well
Fortes 2001; McCook et al. 2001; Wolanski et al. as an identical tidal range within their estuaries.
2003). Golbuu et al. (2003) reported that soil ero- Both rivers flow into coral-fringed lagoons through
sion is presently affecting the Ngerikiil River, its mangrove swamps, which comprises 3.8% of each
estuary and its fringing coral reefs in Airai Bay, catchment area and fringe the whole length of the
Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia (7 220 N, estuary to the tidal excursion limit.
134 340 E; Figure 1). There are no pre-development In 2000, the ‘Babeldaob Compact Road’
data on soil erosion rates in the area to help assess (a 52-mile road around Babeldaob) and the
the changes in sediment yield during the recent ‘Capital Relocation’ (a new capital building in
peak development period. However, local residents Melekeok) projects were initiated. A portion of
attribute the recent increased erosion in the catch- the Compact road runs through the Ngerdorch
ment, the reported rapid siltation of the estuary, catchment and the new Capital Building is being
and the die-off of coral reefs in Airai Bay to constructed on one hillside of the catchment.
unplanned development activities in the catchment These developments will lead to large-scale land
278
Figure 1. (a and b) Map of the Ngerdorch and Ngerikiil River catchments, Babeldaob Island, Palau, Micronesia. (c) Ngerdorch estuary
showing the sampling sites described in the text. Abbreviations are T1, T2 . . . ¼ location of sediment traps and S0, S1. . . ¼ locations of
moored instruments.
clearing and an anticipated increase in soil farms within the catchment while the Ngerikiil
erosion in the near future. In 2002, the Ngerdorch catchment has experienced significant housing
River catchment was still relatively pristine, and farming developments during the last few
being largely forested with only three small years.
279
Table 1. Characteristics of the Ngerikiil and Ngerdorch river in-situ using water samples brought to the laboratory
catchments, Palau. and filtered on 0.45 m filters, which were dried at
60 C in a drying oven for 24 h and weighed.
Ngerikiila
Ngerdorch
At station S2, at 6 m depth, the vertical profile at
Catchment size (km2) 39 19 0.5 m intervals of horizontal currents was mea-
Mean estuarine SSC (mg lÀ1) 19 500
sured at 5 min intervals using a bottom-mounted
Peak estuarine SSC (mg lÀ1) 160 >1500
RDI Workhorse ADCP. In addition, the vertical
Mangrove area/catchment area 3.8% 3.8%
profile of salinity, temperature and SSC were mea-
Trapping in mangrove 28–44% 15–30%
Sediment yield (tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) 1.9 >150 sured at stations S0–S3 with a ship-born YSI CTD
profiler-cum nephelometer. These measurements
a
Source: Golbuu et al. (2003).
were carried out daily following a flood event in
October 2002 for one week and occasionally for the
To assess the human impact on soil erosion rates,
duration of the study. Salinity is expressed in psu,
we undertook a field study to quantify and com-
which for our study sites is practically equivalent
pare the riverine sediment load and role of man-
to ppt.
groves in determining the fate of fine sediment in
Single, bottom-mounted sediment traps, with a
the two tropical estuaries. Observations showed
diameter of 5.08 cm, were mounted at the edge of
that (1) the Ngerdorch catchment is relatively pris-
the mangroves on the river bank between stations
tine with mature vegetation, extensive ground
S0 and S3 and in the mangroves along a transect
cover and forested river banks; (2) the Ngerikiil
perpendicular to the river bank at 10, 20 and 30 m
catchment has been heavily impacted by poor
from station S1. The sediment traps were deployed
land use practices resulting in elevated rates of
on 12 October 2002 and recovered 120 days later.
soil erosion; and (3) mangroves comprises 3.8% of
The National Weather Service provided daily
each catchment area. Based on these observations,
rainfall data at Koror, located about 12 km south-
we expected the following: (1) the sediment load in
west of study sites. The rainfall data were used to
Ngerdorch River will be less than in Ngerikiil River
correlate sedimentation rate and SSC values.
and (2) the holding capacity of the mangroves will
be the same for both estuaries.
Results
Methods
Semi-diurnal, meso-tides prevailed with a pro-
Four oceanographic moorings were deployed at nounced diurnal inequality, and a strong spring–
stations S1–S3 (Figure 1) from September to neap tide cycle. The tidal range was about 2 m at
October 2003. These stations formed an along- spring tide and 1 m at neap tide. A salt wedge
channel transect. Salinity, temperature and prevailed throughout the field study (Figure 2)
suspended sediment concentration (SSC) were and the isohalines were nearly horizontal. The
measured at stations S1 (at 1 m above the bottom brackish water plume lifted off the bottom between
at 4 m depth) and S3 (at 2 m below the surface at 6 m stations S0 and S1.
depth), using self-logging Analite nephelometers, The SSC contour lines were not parallel to the
Dataflow salinometers and an YSI self-logging isohalines; instead they sloped upwards toward the
CTD-cum nephelometer. The instruments were river mouth. A turbidity maximum zone existed
attached onto 1 m long steel star pickets (rebar) near the lift-off point (Figure 2). Hence most of
driven into the substratum. The Analite nephelo- the suspended sediments fall out of suspension in
meters and YSI instrument were equipped with the estuary before the plume exits the mouth of the
wipers that cleaned the sensor every 30 and 10 min, estuary (Figure 2b). Some of that sediment may get
respectively. The instruments logged data at 10 min re-suspended during incoming tides (Figure 2c) and
intervals. The data were sampled at 0.5 s intervals may be brought back into the inner estuary and the
and averaged over 1 min for all sensors except mangroves.
the YSI, which logged data continuously without The salinity in the salt wedge at site S1 fluctuated
averaging. The nephelometers were calibrated as a result of both the tides and the rainfall (Figure 3).
280
Figure 2. A long-channel distribution of salinity (ppt) and SSC (mg LÀ1) in the Ngerdorch estuary during 17–19 October 2002. Station
locations are shown in Figure 1.
The highest values of salinity were found at high in the estuary. The salt wedge exists as a result of the
tide, and the lowest values at low tides. The SSC small tidal currents and the large depth of the estu-
values in the salt wedge at site S1 also fluctuated at ary. The riverine fine sediment did not follow the
the tidal frequency (Figure 3). They were the high- freshwater flow. Instead, the suspended sediment
est at high tide and following large rainfall events. settled out of the brackish, surface plume and was
The low-frequency currents at site S2 in the estu- re-entrained towards the head of the estuary by the
ary were predominantly landward in the salt baroclinic currents in the salt wedge. A turbidity
wedge, and seaward in the brackish water plume maximum zone prevailed near the plume lift-off
near the surface (Figure 3). The currents also varied point.
at the tidal frequency, though the tidal currents Occasional aerial observations (P. Colin, pers.
were usually smaller than the low-frequency comm.) suggest that the river plume was deflected
currents. alongshore, and this may explain why in our obser-
During the field study, neither the freshwater vations the river plume generally did not reach
plume nor the riverine fine sediments reached off- offshore waters (S3).
shore waters (S3) in quantity, except once for about It was possible to estimate the freshwater flow
20 min following a short river flood (Figure 3). The rate, Qf, from the classical two-layer estuarine
siltation rates in the mangroves were 65, 12 and equation (Pritchard and Burt 1951)
9 mg cmÀ2 dayÀ1 at 10, 20 and 30 m inside the Qf ¼ Qin
,
mangroves from the banks of the estuary. Hence
½Sout =ðSin À SoutÞ
most of the suspended sediments were deposited
within 50 m of the edge of the river, in agreement where Qf is the freshwater flow rate, Qin is the
with findings in other macro-tidal mangroves inflow rate in the salt wedge, Sin is the salinity in
(Wolanski et al. 2001). the bottom layer and Sout is the salinity in the salt
wedge. Qin was calculated as follows:
Discussion Qin ¼ uA,
The observations suggest a permanent freshwater where u was the velocity in the salt wedge as mea-
inflow that formed a permanent salt wedge circulation sured by the ADCP and A was the cross-sectional
281
Figure 3. Time-series plot of daily rainfall, salinity and SSC in the salt wedge at site S1 and near the surface at site S3, and velocity (>0 if
seaward; <0 if landward) in the brackish water plume and in the salt wedge at site 2. Station locations are shown in Figure 1.
area of the salt wedge. The brackish water outflow, the brackish water plume and the salt wedge,
Qout, was calculated as: respectively. The latter values were taken from the
daily CTD casts. The net estuarine sediment
Qout ¼ Qf þ Qin :
export, Qnet, was calculated as:
The net fine sediment fluxes in the river, in the
Qnet ¼ Qout À Qin :
brackish water plume and in the salt wedge were
then calculated as QfCf, QoutCout and QinCin, where For the period of September–October 2002, the net
Cf, Cout and Cin were the SSC values in the river, fine sediment fluxes in the river and out of the
282
estuary were 3.2 ± 1.915 and 2.3 ± 1.044 g sÀ1, watershed. The implication is that while Ngerdorch
respectively. This suggests that the mangroves watershed is still relatively pristine, coral reef con-
may trap about 0.9 g sÀ1, i.e., about 28% of the servation and management effort may not be pos-
riverine fine sediment inflow. However the possible sible without proper land management in the
error of this estimate is large. The sediment traps in surrounding catchment.
the mangroves suggest a mean settling rate of The result of this study may have broad applica-
1.4 g sÀ1, or about 44% of the riverine fine sediment tions to coastal coral reef ecosystem worldwide.
flux. Interestingly, the mangroves trap a similar Sedimentation associated with poor land manage-
fraction of the fine sediment in the Ngerikiil estu- ment has been identified as a dominant problem by
ary, although the riverine fine sediment yield in this the US Coral Reef Task Force. While physical and
estuary is 10–19 times higher (Table 1). In both the biological characteristics may vary among coral
Ngerdorch and the Ngerikiil estuaries, the man- reef sites, the outcome of poor land use will be the
groves comprise about 3.8% of the catchment. same: accumulation of sediment that will prevent
This suggests that the sediment trapping efficiency coral larval recruitment and recovery of corals
of mangroves is a function of tidal dynamics in the (Golbuu et. al. 2003).
mangrove wetlands, and not of riverine suspended
sediment concentration. Acknowledgements
The Ngerdorch estuary is still relatively pristine
compared with Ngerikiil estuary (Table 1). In the The Palau International Coral Reef Center, the
context of the whole world, the Ngerdorch estuary University of Guam, the Australian Institute of
is pristine compared with a similar sized river in Marine Science, the US-EPA STAR program
Southeast Asia and Oceania (Milliman and Meade (grant R 82-8008) and the NOAA Coastal Oceans
1983) and of a small mountainous catchment with Program (grant NA16OP2920) supported this
elevation <100 m in Oceania (Milliman and study. The authors gratefully acknowledge
Syvitski 1992). The sediment yield in the the assistance and support of Arius Merep,
Ngerdorch River (1.9 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) was slightly Masao Udui and Kenjo Yamashiro. Katharina
smaller than that (2.4 tons kmÀ2 yrÀ1) predicted by Fabricius, Peter Houk and Fleming U. Sengebau
Milliman and Styvitski (1992). reviewed and improved an earlier version of this
Thus, mangroves play an important role in redu- manuscript.
cing coastal erosion (Mazda et al. 2002) and pro-
tecting fringing coral reefs from sedimentation.
The Ngerdorch and Ngerikiil estuaries mangroves References
flood semi-diurnally, and they may trap up to 44%
of the riverine fine sediment. As suggested by Dubinsky Z. and Stambler N. 1996. Marine pollution and coral
Golbuu et al. (2003) for the Ngerikiil River, this reefs. Global Change Biology 2: 511–526.
Edinger E.N., Jompa J., Limmon G.V., Widjatmoko W. and
trapping efficiency, while helpful, is not sufficient
Risk M. 1998. Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in
to prevent degradation of coastal coral reefs from
Indonesia: effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing
excessive sedimentation resulting from extensive practices and changes over time. Marine Pollution Bulletin
land clearing and poor farming practices. 36(8): 617–630.
Siltation of the Ngerdorch estuary and coral reef Fortes M. 2001. The effects of siltation on tropical coastal
ecosystems. In: Wolanski E. (ed.), Oceanographic Processes
degradation in the lagoon waters is likely to occur
of Coral Reefs. Physical and Biological Links in the Great
if land clearing and poor farming practices are not
Barrier Reef, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 93–111.
regulated as they were the last few years in the Golbuu Y., Victor S., Wolanski E. and Richmond R.H. 2003.
Ngerikiil catchment. Trapping of fine sediment in enclosed bay, Palau, Micronesia.
Estuarine, Coastal and Self Science 57: 941–949.
Mazda Y., Magi M., Nanao H., Kogo M., Miyagi T.,
Kanazawa N. and Kobashi D. 2002. Coastal erosion due to
Conclusion
long term human impact on mangrove forests. Wetlands
Ecology and Management 10: 1–9.
The sediment yield in Ngerikiil watershed is 10–19 McCook L.J., Wolanski E. and Spagnol S. 2001. Modelling and
times higher than in the less developed Ngerdorch visualizing interactions between natural disturbances and
283
eutrophication as causes of coral reef degradation. In: USDI (United States Department of the Interior), 1997.
Wolanski E. (ed.), Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs. Environmental impact statement for construction of the
Physical and Biological Links in the Great Barrier Reef, CRC Palau compact road, Babeldaob Island, Republic of Palau.
Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 113–125. vol. II, Project No. 296-001, Washington D.C.
Meade R.H. 1996. River-sediment inputs to major deltas. In: Wolanski E. and Spagnol S. 2000. Environmental degradation
Milliman J.D. and Haq B.U. (eds), Sea Level Rise and by mud in tropical estuaries. Regional Environmental Change
Coastal Subsidence, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 63–85. 1(3–4): 152–162.
Milliman J.D. and Meade R.H. 1983. World-wide delivery Wolanski E., Mazda Y., Furukawa K., Ridd P., Kitheka J.,
of river sediment to the oceans. Journal of Geology 91(1): Spagnol S. and Stieglitz T. 2001. Water circulation through
1–21. mangroves and its implications for biodiversity. In: Wolanski E.
Milliman J.D. and Syvitski J.P.M. 1992. Geomorphic/tectonic (ed.), Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs: Physical and
control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance Biological Links in the Great Barrier Reef, CRC Press, Boca
of small mountainous rivers. Journal of Geology 100: Raton, FL, pp. 53–76.
525–544. Wolanski E., Richmond R.H., Davis G. and Bonito V. 2003.
Prichard D.W. and Burt W.V. 1951. An inexpensive and rapid Water and fine sediment dynamics in transient river plumes in
technique for obtaining current profiles in estuarine waters. a small, reef-fringed bay, Guam. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf
Journal of Marine Research 10: 180–189. Science 56: 1029–1040.